In the previous post, I described my intention of creating a playable testbed for experiments with different pickups. It turned out to be nice to play, so I improved it with a strap horn and the acrylic body from my t-beam bass. As it turned out, it was quite neck heavy. And since I prefer a headless guitar in most circumstances, I began to consider a tuner system down behind the bridge plus removing the headstock.
The design - as many others - uses traditional tuners mounted at the end of the guitar. Most of the existing designs however, has the strings fan out from the bridge and onto the tuners. The tuners have a lot of distance between them in order to allow room for the fingers when tuning. One solution is a design using two rows of three tunes facing each other and sharing the same slot. For the latter, I bought a set of six twelve-string tuners (they have the pegs closer together than six string tuners, saving space).
I built a bracket for mounting them on the end of the testbed guitar. It is soldered together from rectangular brass profiles. The profiles carrying the tuners are at an angle so that there's a (reasonably) straight string pull.
The tuners are made from one side of the twelve string tuners, cut in half - i.e. 2 x 3 tuners. I found out that they had a nice copper coating beneath the crome, so I filed away some of the chrome. I hope, when the steel and copper oxidizes, that they will look more discreet. They seem to work decently, but I imagine that better quality tuners might improve the system somewhat.
The strings can be tuned easily and precisely. Mounting the strings is a bit troublesome, but will probably be easier when I've tried it a couple of times. Unfortunately, my soldering job was insufficient and the top plate broke off. When I re-soldered it (and bolted it too, to be on the safe side), I was too hasty, and the holes for the pegs didn't line up. I had to do a bit of filing, and now the arrangement works, but less smoothly than the first time. I'm not completely satisfied, so I will buy a machine vise for my drill press and make a better bracket. That will give me a chance also to try some better tuners. They could be these due to their good looks (though it might look too _deliberately aged_ for my taste) or these due to their high gear ratio
If they keep working well, I'll cut the headstock off the neck, but for now I am anchoring the ball end of the strings in the existing tuner pegs on the headstock. I plan to play it for some time and make sure that it's a keeper (the overall design, not this particular version). I've got to be certain this works before chopping away.
Thursday, 30 December 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
hi alex
for the spanish tuners, howvwas the tuning n did it hold it pitch well ? also as a set of tuners were coming at a low angle, did it affect the pitch or stablity ?
i assume this design will only work if the tuners are installed facing eachother...the grover u hv linked seems nice actually
Yes, they held the tuning well. Tuning was fairly smooth in my first version. Unfortunately, the soldering broke, and after reassembling it with screws, it's become misaligned and gave quite some resistance when turning the knobs.
To make it work smooth, the six holes in each of the plates holding the tuners have to be well aligned and mounted properly. (Each plate has three holes for the three tuners mounted on it, and three holes to support the top of the opposite row of tuners).
The tuners have to have a hole for the strings in the center of the tuning peg. When mounted opposite each other, the holes align reasonably.
I could see using this neck tuning setup with my tremolo I am developing. See "JS Tremolo" on Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3ClbjLjG5Y
Post a Comment